Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 28/01/2026
Abstract Views: 77
Views PDF: 31
DOI: 10.56535/jmpm.v51i1.1728
Issue
Vol. 51 No. 1 (2026): JOURNAL OF MILITARY PHARMACO-MEDICINE No.1 - 2026
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Ngo, P. L., Ma, N. T. H., Ta, D. D., & Pham, Q. D. (2026). EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH PERCEVAL PLUS SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL. Journal of Military Pharmaco-medicine, 51(1), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.56535/jmpm.v51i1.1728

EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH PERCEVAL PLUS SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL

Phi Long Ngo1, Nguyen Thai Hoang Ma1, Dinh Do Ta1, Quoc Dat Pham1,
1 Bệnh viện Bạch Mai

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To report the initial experience with Perceval Plus sutureless aortic valve replacement.Methods: A descriptive study was conducted on 4 patients who underwent sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval Plus at Bach Mai Hospital. Surgical indications in patients with aortic stenosis or combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. All patients were approached via median sternotomy, the diseased valve was excised, annular calcification was removed, the annulus was sized, and the prosthesis was implanted following the standardised protocol. Results: The mean aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 60.5 ± 19.2 and 83.8 ± 17.8 minutes, respectively. There were no postoperative deaths, no paravalvular leak, and no patients required permanent pacemaker implantation. At the time of discharge, transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a marked improvement in effective orifice area (EOA) with low transvalvular pressure gradients. Conclusion: Sutureless aortic valve replacement with good initial outcomes showed that this is a feasible and safe surgical option.

Keywords

Sutureless aortic valve, Perceval Plus, Aortic valve disease

Article Details

References

1. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). Jun 2022; 75(6):524.
2. Micovic S, Nobre A, Choi JW, et al. Early outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Perceval PLUS sutureless valve: Results of the prospective multicentric MANTRA study. J Cardiothorac Surg. Jun 21, 2024; 19(1):340.
3. Quinn RD. The 10 Commandments of Perceval Implantation. Innovations. 2023; 18(4):299-307.
4. Tsai FC, Li HY, Chou AH, Huang HC, Gersak B. Modified implant technique of perceval sutureless valve in congenital type 0 bicuspid valve stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. May 2021; 111(5):e369-e371.
5. Glauber M, Miceli A, di Bacco L. Sutureless and rapid deployment valves: Implantation technique from A to Z-the Perceval valve. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2020; 9(4):330-340.
6. Dokollari A, Ramlawi B, Torregrossa G, et al. Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:789392.
7. Wang C, Xie Y, Zhang H, et al. Sutureless vs. rapid-deployment valve: A systemic review and meta-analysis for a direct comparison of intraoperative performance and clinical outcomes. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1123487.
8. Moscarelli M, Santarpino G, Athanasiou T, et al. A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. Oct 4 2021; 33(4):501-509.